LITF-PA-2026-139 · Digital Health / Edge AI / Ambient Computing

System and Method for Non-Intrusive Screening of Cognitive Decline Using Longitudinal Analysis of Smart Home Appliance Interaction Patterns with Sequential Activity Modeling and Behavioral Drift Detection via Edge-Deployed Temporal Transformers

Conceptual diagram of a smart home with overlaid interaction pattern data streams from various connected devices
⚖️ Prior Art Notice: This document is published as defensive prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1). The inventions described herein are dedicated to the public domain as of the publication date above. This disclosure is intended to prevent the patenting of these concepts by any party.

Abstract

Disclosed is a system and method for continuous, non-intrusive screening of early-stage cognitive decline in residential occupants by analyzing longitudinal patterns of interaction with existing smart home devices. The system ingests timestamped event logs from smart speakers, smart thermostats, smart lighting controls, smart locks, kitchen appliances, and entertainment systems already present in the home, requiring no additional hardware installation and no wearable compliance. A local hub (e.g., Matter/Thread border router, Home Assistant instance, or purpose-built edge appliance) runs an edge-deployed temporal transformer model that learns the household's baseline interaction grammar: the characteristic sequences, timing distributions, repetition rates, and contextual associations of device interactions for each identified occupant. The model continuously computes a composite Behavioral Regularity Index (BRI) across seven cognitive domains mapped from device interaction features: executive function (multi-step task completion patterns), episodic memory (redundant interaction frequency), temporal orientation (circadian adherence of routine activities), attention/concentration (task-switching fragmentation rate), semantic memory (voice command vocabulary diversity), visuospatial navigation (lighting and room-transition patterns), and processing speed (interaction-to-completion latency trends). Statistical process control charts (CUSUM and EWMA) applied to each domain's BRI component detect sustained directional drift exceeding learned within-subject variability. When drift in two or more domains exceeds a configurable threshold for 14+ consecutive days, the system generates a structured screening report delivered to a designated caregiver or primary care physician via a secure channel, containing the drift trajectories, anonymized interaction exemplars, and a recommendation for formal neurocognitive evaluation. All processing occurs on-device. No raw interaction data, voice recordings, or personally identifiable information leaves the home network.

Field of the Invention

This invention relates to digital health screening, ambient assisted living, and edge computing for behavioral analytics, specifically to the use of existing consumer smart home device interaction logs as a passive, longitudinal behavioral biomarker for early detection of neurodegenerative cognitive decline including mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early-stage dementia.

Background

Alzheimer's disease and related dementias affect an estimated 6.9 million Americans aged 65 and older (Alzheimer's Association, 2024 Facts and Figures), with total care costs exceeding $360 billion annually. Mild cognitive impairment, the prodromal stage that precedes dementia in many patients, affects an additional 15.6% of adults over 60 (Petersen et al., Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2018). The median time from MCI onset to clinical diagnosis is 2.8 years (Rasmussen & Bhatt, 2020), a gap during which disease-modifying interventions like lecanemab (van Dyck et al., NEJM 2023) and donanemab (Sims et al., JAMA 2023) are most effective but cannot be administered because the patient has not yet been identified.

Current screening approaches share a common problem: they require the person to know something is wrong.

The gap in the art is a screening system that: (a) requires zero active participation from the person being monitored, (b) uses hardware already installed in the home for other purposes, (c) builds a continuous longitudinal behavioral profile rather than episodic snapshots, (d) maps observable device interactions to established cognitive domains, (e) preserves privacy by processing all data locally, and (f) produces clinically actionable screening output that a physician can act on.

Detailed Description

1. Data Ingestion Layer

The system operates as a software agent running on a local compute hub within the home network. It ingests event streams from smart home devices via standard protocols:

Each ingested event is normalized to a canonical tuple: (timestamp, device_id, device_type, event_type, value, room_id, occupant_id). Occupant identification in multi-person households uses a probabilistic model combining: voice speaker identification from smart speaker events (where available as a metadata field, never raw audio), room-presence inference from motion sensor activation sequences, smartphone BLE proximity beacons, and habitual device-use timing profiles. The system explicitly handles shared devices by attributing interactions to the occupant most likely present, with a confidence score; interactions below 0.7 confidence are excluded from individual profiles and contributed only to household-level statistics.

2. Behavioral Feature Extraction

The system extracts 47 behavioral features grouped into seven cognitive domain proxies. The mapping from device interaction observables to cognitive domains draws on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for Major and Mild Neurocognitive Disorder, which define six cognitive domains. We add a seventh (circadian temporal orientation) based on the established relationship between circadian rhythm disruption and neurodegeneration (Musiek & Holtzman, Science 2016).

Cognitive DomainDevice Interaction FeaturesFeature Count
Executive FunctionMulti-step task completion rate (e.g., unlock door → disarm alarm → turn on lights), task ordering consistency, abandoned multi-device sequences, novel-vs-routine task ratio8
Episodic MemoryRedundant interaction frequency (re-locking already-locked doors, re-setting already-set thermostats, repeated identical voice queries within 30 min), check-back rate for completed actions7
Temporal OrientationCircadian drift of routine activities (meal preparation timing via kitchen appliance activation, sleep onset via bedroom light-off, wake time via first interaction), weekend/weekday pattern consistency, seasonal adjustment tracking8
Attention / ConcentrationTask-switching fragmentation rate (starting an activity in one room, moving to another room mid-task, returning), entertainment session duration stability, thermostat adjustment frequency within single comfort-seeking episodes6
Semantic MemoryVoice command vocabulary diversity (unique command stems per week), command reformulation rate (rephrasing failed commands), proper noun usage in queries (names of contacts, places, media titles)6
Visuospatial NavigationRoom transition sequence regularity, light-on-before-entry anticipation rate, novel path frequency through the home (inferred from sequential room sensor activations), nighttime navigation pattern changes6
Processing SpeedInteraction-to-completion latency for goal-directed device sequences, voice command response selection time (for devices reporting confirmation delay), time from alarm trigger to dismissal6

Each feature is computed over rolling 7-day windows with 1-day stride. Raw feature values are z-score normalized against the occupant's own 90-day trailing baseline, producing a deviation score that captures within-subject change independent of absolute values. This design is critical: the system never compares one person to another. A person who has always adjusted their thermostat six times a day is normal at six; the signal is when six becomes twelve.

3. Temporal Transformer Architecture

The core model is a lightweight temporal transformer operating on the 47-dimensional feature vector time series. The architecture comprises: an input embedding layer that projects each 7-day feature vector (47 dimensions) into a 64-dimensional latent space with learned positional encoding; 4 transformer encoder layers with 4 attention heads, 128-dimensional feedforward layers, and GELU activation, with a total parameter count of approximately 180K (small enough for real-time inference on ESP32-S3 or Raspberry Pi Zero 2W); a domain-specific output head that produces 7 BRI component scores (one per cognitive domain), each normalized to [0, 1] where 1.0 represents the occupant's learned baseline and values below 1.0 indicate deviation; and a composite BRI score computed as the attention-weighted mean of domain scores, where attention weights are learned during pre-training to reflect the relative diagnostic weight of each domain for MCI/dementia classification.

Pre-training uses a self-supervised masked feature prediction objective on a large corpus of synthetic smart home interaction sequences generated by an activity simulator calibrated against the CASAS Smart Home Dataset (Washington State University, 400+ participants, 30+ smart home testbeds) and the UCI HAR Dataset. Fine-tuning on real household data occurs entirely on-device during the 90-day baseline learning phase, using the occupant's own interaction patterns. No training data leaves the home. The model adapts to household-specific device configurations automatically: if a home has no smart speaker, the 6 semantic memory features are masked and the remaining 41 features are reweighted via attention redistribution.

4. Drift Detection Engine

Raw BRI scores fluctuate day to day due to illness, visitors, travel, and routine disruptions. The system distinguishes transient perturbations from sustained cognitive decline using two complementary statistical process control methods applied to each domain's BRI component independently:

A domain is flagged as "drifting" when both CUSUM and EWMA agree on sustained downward movement. The system generates a screening alert when two or more domains are simultaneously flagged for 14+ consecutive days. This dual-method, multi-domain requirement dramatically reduces false positives from single-domain transient causes (a cold suppresses processing speed; a visiting grandchild disrupts routine scheduling; a new device changes interaction patterns during the learning period).

5. Confound Handling

The system incorporates explicit confound detection to prevent false alerts:

6. Output and Clinical Integration

The screening report generated upon alert includes: a 90-day time-series plot of composite BRI and per-domain BRI scores; identification of which domains triggered the alert, with magnitude and duration of drift; anonymized exemplar interaction patterns showing the behavioral change (e.g., "redundant thermostat adjustments increased from baseline mean 1.2/day to current 4.8/day over 6 weeks"); comparison to published MCI behavioral signature profiles from the research literature; and an explicit disclaimer that this is a screening tool, not a diagnostic instrument, and that formal neurocognitive evaluation is recommended.

The report is delivered via: encrypted email to a designated caregiver email address; a secure API endpoint for integration with electronic health record (EHR) systems supporting HL7 FHIR R4 DiagnosticReport resources; or a companion smartphone application with caregiver authentication. The occupant (or their designated healthcare proxy) controls all data sharing permissions. The system supports complete data deletion on demand.

7. Privacy Architecture

All computation occurs on the local hub. The system never transmits raw event logs, voice recordings, or personally identifiable interaction data to any cloud service. The model runs on-device and updates on-device. The screening report contains only aggregate statistical measures and anonymized behavioral summaries. The companion app communicates with the local hub via an encrypted local network tunnel (WireGuard or similar), not through a cloud relay. If the occupant or their legal representative revokes consent, all stored data and learned model weights are cryptographically erased. The system is designed to comply with HIPAA (45 CFR Parts 160 and 164) as a non-covered entity providing screening information directly to the individual or their authorized representative, and with GDPR Article 9 requirements for processing health-related data with explicit consent.

Claims

  1. A system for non-intrusive cognitive decline screening comprising: a software agent running on a local compute hub within a residential network that ingests timestamped interaction event logs from two or more smart home devices of different categories (selected from smart speakers, smart thermostats, smart lighting, smart locks, kitchen appliances, and entertainment systems); a behavioral feature extraction module that computes a plurality of behavioral features from said event logs and maps them to cognitive domains defined by recognized neurocognitive diagnostic criteria; a temporal transformer model running on-device that produces per-domain Behavioral Regularity Index scores by comparing current interaction patterns to the occupant's learned baseline; a drift detection engine applying statistical process control methods to said BRI scores to identify sustained directional deviation in two or more cognitive domains; and a report generation module that produces a structured screening report for delivery to a designated caregiver or healthcare provider.
  2. The system of claim 1, wherein the behavioral features include: redundant interaction frequency as a proxy for episodic memory function, multi-step task completion rate as a proxy for executive function, circadian drift of routine activities as a proxy for temporal orientation, task-switching fragmentation rate as a proxy for attention, voice command vocabulary diversity as a proxy for semantic memory, room transition sequence regularity as a proxy for visuospatial navigation, and interaction-to-completion latency as a proxy for processing speed.
  3. The system of claim 1, wherein all computation including model inference, feature extraction, drift detection, and report generation occurs entirely on a local device within the home network, with no raw interaction data transmitted to any external server.
  4. The system of claim 1, wherein the temporal transformer model is pre-trained using self-supervised masked feature prediction on synthetic smart home interaction sequences and fine-tuned on-device using the occupant's own interaction data during a baseline learning period.
  5. The system of claim 1, wherein the drift detection engine applies both CUSUM and EWMA statistical process control methods independently to each cognitive domain's BRI score, requiring agreement between both methods before flagging a domain as drifting.
  6. The system of claim 1, further comprising a confound detection module that identifies and compensates for: household composition changes detected via occupant count estimation, device topology changes detected via new or missing device events, acute illness patterns detected via aggregate behavioral shift signatures, seasonal and daylight effects computed from geographic coordinates, and caregiver-reported medication changes.
  7. The system of claim 1, wherein occupant identification in multi-person households uses a probabilistic model combining voice speaker identification metadata, room-presence inference from sequential motion sensor activations, smartphone BLE proximity, and habitual interaction timing profiles, with interactions below a configurable confidence threshold excluded from individual cognitive profiles.
  8. A method for screening cognitive decline comprising: continuously ingesting interaction events from a plurality of smart home devices over a period of at least 90 days to establish a behavioral baseline for a residential occupant; extracting behavioral features mapped to recognized neurocognitive domains from said interaction events using rolling temporal windows; computing a Behavioral Regularity Index for each cognitive domain using an on-device temporal transformer model that compares current feature values to the established baseline; applying statistical process control analysis to detect sustained directional drift in BRI scores; and generating a screening alert when two or more cognitive domains exhibit simultaneous sustained drift exceeding a configurable threshold for a minimum consecutive duration.
  9. The method of claim 8, wherein the behavioral features are z-score normalized against the occupant's own trailing baseline, such that the system detects within-subject change independent of absolute interaction rates and never compares the occupant's behavior to population norms or other individuals.
  10. The method of claim 8, wherein the screening alert includes per-domain drift trajectories, anonymized behavioral exemplars showing the nature of the detected change, comparison to published MCI behavioral signatures, and an explicit recommendation for formal neurocognitive evaluation.
  11. The method of claim 8, further comprising a privacy enforcement layer that: processes all data on a local device within the home network, stores no raw voice recordings, encrypts all stored interaction logs with a key controlled by the occupant or their healthcare proxy, supports complete cryptographic erasure of all data and model weights upon consent revocation, and delivers screening reports only through encrypted channels to explicitly authorized recipients.
  12. The method of claim 8, wherein the temporal transformer model automatically adapts to the specific device configuration of each household by masking features derived from absent device categories and redistributing attention weights to available features, requiring no manual configuration or device-specific setup.

Implementation Notes

A minimal viable implementation requires: a Raspberry Pi 4 or equivalent local compute device ($35-75), running Home Assistant or a custom MQTT broker; 5+ smart home devices spanning at least 3 device categories (e.g., smart speaker + smart thermostat + smart lighting), which are already present in an estimated 63% of US households as of 2025 (Statista); and Python 3.10+ with PyTorch or TensorFlow Lite for model inference. The temporal transformer model at 180K parameters requires approximately 720 KB of storage and performs inference in under 50 ms on a Cortex-A72 processor. Total additional hardware cost for a household already equipped with smart devices: $35-75 for the compute hub if no existing hub is available; $0 if the household already runs a Home Assistant instance, SmartThings hub, or similar controller.

The 90-day baseline learning period is a practical requirement, not a theoretical minimum. Shorter baselines (30-60 days) are feasible for occupants with highly regular routines but produce higher false positive rates due to insufficient sampling of weekend/holiday/seasonal variation. Longer baselines (120-180 days) improve specificity at the cost of delayed screening onset.

The seven-domain cognitive mapping is intentionally more granular than strictly necessary for MCI screening (which is often assessed on a single composite score). The domain-level resolution serves two purposes: it reduces false positives by requiring multi-domain concordance (a broken thermostat doesn't trigger an alert because it affects only one domain), and it provides clinically useful information about which cognitive functions are changing, guiding the choice of formal neuropsychological testing battery.

Known limitations: the system cannot screen for cognitive decline in occupants who do not interact with smart home devices; multi-person households with similar interaction patterns (spouses with synchronized routines) may produce noisy occupant attribution; the system is not a diagnostic tool and cannot distinguish between MCI due to Alzheimer's pathology, vascular cognitive impairment, Lewy body disease, or other etiologies; and the efficacy of the screening approach has not yet been validated in a prospective clinical trial. A validation study design would require a cohort of 200+ older adults (age 65+) living in instrumented smart homes, with concurrent annual MoCA/MMSE screening and optional amyloid PET or CSF biomarker confirmation of cases, followed for a minimum of 3 years. The primary endpoint would be sensitivity and specificity for MCI detection at a lead time of 6+ months before clinical diagnosis, benchmarked against the USPSTF's current conclusion of insufficient evidence (I statement) for routine cognitive impairment screening.